“In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse”: A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
“In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse” : A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany. / Rød, Helene; Gomperts, Rebecca; Atay, Hazal; Tersbøl, Britt Pinkowski.
I: Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Bind 36, 100854, 2023.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - “In some clinics, they said it's elective, and then they would refuse”
T2 - A Mixed-Methods Study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to abortion services in Germany
AU - Rød, Helene
AU - Gomperts, Rebecca
AU - Atay, Hazal
AU - Tersbøl, Britt Pinkowski
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objective: The World Health Organization recognizes abortion as essential health care and has encouraged governments to ensure access to abortion services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the threat of infection combined with government responses to COVID-19 have impacted access to abortion services globally. This study explores access to abortion in Germany during the pandemic. Methods: This study used a mixed-methods design. An analysis of data collected by Women on Web (WoW) was carried out to assess women's reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion outside the formal health system in Germany during the pandemic. Descriptive statistics were generated for 2057 requests for telemedicine abortion received by WoW between March 2020-March 2021. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight healthcare professionals involved in the provision of abortion services to explore how they perceive of women's access to abortion services in Germany during the pandemic. Results: The quantitative analysis found that preferences and needs for privacy (47.3%), secrecy (44.4%) and comfort (43.9%) were the most common reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion. COVID-19 was another important reason (38.8%). The thematic analysis of the interviews was organized into two overarching themes: service provision, and axes of difference. Conclusions: The pandemic affected the provision of abortion services as well as the circumstances of women seeking abortion. The main barriers to access were financial constraints, privacy issues, and lack of abortion providers. Throughout the pandemic, accessing abortion services was more difficult for many women in Germany, especially women experiencing multiple and overlapping forms of discrimination.
AB - Objective: The World Health Organization recognizes abortion as essential health care and has encouraged governments to ensure access to abortion services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the threat of infection combined with government responses to COVID-19 have impacted access to abortion services globally. This study explores access to abortion in Germany during the pandemic. Methods: This study used a mixed-methods design. An analysis of data collected by Women on Web (WoW) was carried out to assess women's reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion outside the formal health system in Germany during the pandemic. Descriptive statistics were generated for 2057 requests for telemedicine abortion received by WoW between March 2020-March 2021. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight healthcare professionals involved in the provision of abortion services to explore how they perceive of women's access to abortion services in Germany during the pandemic. Results: The quantitative analysis found that preferences and needs for privacy (47.3%), secrecy (44.4%) and comfort (43.9%) were the most common reasons for choosing telemedicine abortion. COVID-19 was another important reason (38.8%). The thematic analysis of the interviews was organized into two overarching themes: service provision, and axes of difference. Conclusions: The pandemic affected the provision of abortion services as well as the circumstances of women seeking abortion. The main barriers to access were financial constraints, privacy issues, and lack of abortion providers. Throughout the pandemic, accessing abortion services was more difficult for many women in Germany, especially women experiencing multiple and overlapping forms of discrimination.
KW - Abortion
KW - Abortion access
KW - Barriers to access
KW - Germany
KW - Health policies
KW - Telemedicine abortion
U2 - 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100854
DO - 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100854
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37207395
AN - SCOPUS:85159586480
VL - 36
JO - Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare
JF - Sexual & Reproductive HealthCare
SN - 1877-5756
M1 - 100854
ER -
ID: 357263808