Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing. / Di Nucci, Ezio.

I: Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, Bind 18, Nr. 4, 11.2015, s. 587-590.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Di Nucci, E 2015, 'Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing', Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, bind 18, nr. 4, s. 587-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9620-7

APA

Di Nucci, E. (2015). Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 18(4), 587-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9620-7

Vancouver

Di Nucci E. Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy. 2015 nov.;18(4):587-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9620-7

Author

Di Nucci, Ezio. / Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing. I: Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy. 2015 ; Bind 18, Nr. 4. s. 587-590.

Bibtex

@article{7acf46e4228e4da9ad80de84189f838d,
title = "Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing",
abstract = "On Don Marquis's future of value account of the wrongness of killing, 'what makes it wrong to kill those individuals we all believe it is wrong to kill, is that killing them deprives them of their future of value'. Marquis has recently argued for a narrow interpretation of his future of value account of the wrongness of killing and against the broad interpretation that I had put forward in response to Carson Strong. In this article I argue that the narrow view is problematic because it violates some basic principles of equality and because it allows for some of the very killing that Marquis sets out to condemn; further, I argue that the chief reason why Marquis chooses the narrow view over the broad view-namely that the broad view would take the killing of some non-human animals to be also wrong-should rather be considered a welcome upshot of the broad view.",
author = "{Di Nucci}, Ezio",
year = "2015",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s11019-014-9620-7",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "587--590",
journal = "Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy",
issn = "1386-7423",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing

AU - Di Nucci, Ezio

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - On Don Marquis's future of value account of the wrongness of killing, 'what makes it wrong to kill those individuals we all believe it is wrong to kill, is that killing them deprives them of their future of value'. Marquis has recently argued for a narrow interpretation of his future of value account of the wrongness of killing and against the broad interpretation that I had put forward in response to Carson Strong. In this article I argue that the narrow view is problematic because it violates some basic principles of equality and because it allows for some of the very killing that Marquis sets out to condemn; further, I argue that the chief reason why Marquis chooses the narrow view over the broad view-namely that the broad view would take the killing of some non-human animals to be also wrong-should rather be considered a welcome upshot of the broad view.

AB - On Don Marquis's future of value account of the wrongness of killing, 'what makes it wrong to kill those individuals we all believe it is wrong to kill, is that killing them deprives them of their future of value'. Marquis has recently argued for a narrow interpretation of his future of value account of the wrongness of killing and against the broad interpretation that I had put forward in response to Carson Strong. In this article I argue that the narrow view is problematic because it violates some basic principles of equality and because it allows for some of the very killing that Marquis sets out to condemn; further, I argue that the chief reason why Marquis chooses the narrow view over the broad view-namely that the broad view would take the killing of some non-human animals to be also wrong-should rather be considered a welcome upshot of the broad view.

U2 - 10.1007/s11019-014-9620-7

DO - 10.1007/s11019-014-9620-7

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25608793

VL - 18

SP - 587

EP - 590

JO - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

JF - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

SN - 1386-7423

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 131824472