IVF, same-sex couples and the value of biological ties

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

IVF, same-sex couples and the value of biological ties. / Di Nucci, Ezio.

I: Journal of Medical Ethics, Bind 42, Nr. 12, 12.2016, s. 784-787.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Di Nucci, E 2016, 'IVF, same-sex couples and the value of biological ties', Journal of Medical Ethics, bind 42, nr. 12, s. 784-787. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103257

APA

Di Nucci, E. (2016). IVF, same-sex couples and the value of biological ties. Journal of Medical Ethics, 42(12), 784-787. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103257

Vancouver

Di Nucci E. IVF, same-sex couples and the value of biological ties. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016 dec.;42(12):784-787. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103257

Author

Di Nucci, Ezio. / IVF, same-sex couples and the value of biological ties. I: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016 ; Bind 42, Nr. 12. s. 784-787.

Bibtex

@article{a2a18c2abd6143fbb8af84212130e1f2,
title = "IVF, same-sex couples and the value of biological ties",
abstract = "Ought parents, in general, to value being biologically tied to their children? Is it important, in particular, that both parents be biologically tied to their children? I will address these fundamental questions by looking at a fairly new practice within IVF treatments, so-called IVF-with-ROPA (Reception of Oocytes from Partner), which allows lesbian couples to 'share motherhood', with one partner providing the eggs while the other becomes pregnant. I believe that IVF-with-ROPA is, just like other IVF treatments, morally permissible, but here I argue that the increased biological ties which IVF-with-ROPA allows for do not have any particular value beside the satisfaction of a legitimate wish, because there is no intrinsic value in a biological tie between parents and children; further, I argue that equality within parental projects cannot be achieved by redistributing biological ties.",
author = "{Di Nucci}, Ezio",
note = "Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2015-103257",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "784--787",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - IVF, same-sex couples and the value of biological ties

AU - Di Nucci, Ezio

N1 - Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - Ought parents, in general, to value being biologically tied to their children? Is it important, in particular, that both parents be biologically tied to their children? I will address these fundamental questions by looking at a fairly new practice within IVF treatments, so-called IVF-with-ROPA (Reception of Oocytes from Partner), which allows lesbian couples to 'share motherhood', with one partner providing the eggs while the other becomes pregnant. I believe that IVF-with-ROPA is, just like other IVF treatments, morally permissible, but here I argue that the increased biological ties which IVF-with-ROPA allows for do not have any particular value beside the satisfaction of a legitimate wish, because there is no intrinsic value in a biological tie between parents and children; further, I argue that equality within parental projects cannot be achieved by redistributing biological ties.

AB - Ought parents, in general, to value being biologically tied to their children? Is it important, in particular, that both parents be biologically tied to their children? I will address these fundamental questions by looking at a fairly new practice within IVF treatments, so-called IVF-with-ROPA (Reception of Oocytes from Partner), which allows lesbian couples to 'share motherhood', with one partner providing the eggs while the other becomes pregnant. I believe that IVF-with-ROPA is, just like other IVF treatments, morally permissible, but here I argue that the increased biological ties which IVF-with-ROPA allows for do not have any particular value beside the satisfaction of a legitimate wish, because there is no intrinsic value in a biological tie between parents and children; further, I argue that equality within parental projects cannot be achieved by redistributing biological ties.

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2015-103257

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2015-103257

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27613798

VL - 42

SP - 784

EP - 787

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 166195197