A comparison of the original major depression inventory with a modified version: A Danish validation study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A comparison of the original major depression inventory with a modified version : A Danish validation study. / Pedersen, Henrik Schou; Christensen, Karl Bang; Prior, Anders; Christensen, Kaj Sparle.

I: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Bind 149, Nr. 3, 2024, s. 267-278.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Pedersen, HS, Christensen, KB, Prior, A & Christensen, KS 2024, 'A comparison of the original major depression inventory with a modified version: A Danish validation study', Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, bind 149, nr. 3, s. 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13656

APA

Pedersen, H. S., Christensen, K. B., Prior, A., & Christensen, K. S. (2024). A comparison of the original major depression inventory with a modified version: A Danish validation study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 149(3), 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13656

Vancouver

Pedersen HS, Christensen KB, Prior A, Christensen KS. A comparison of the original major depression inventory with a modified version: A Danish validation study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2024;149(3):267-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13656

Author

Pedersen, Henrik Schou ; Christensen, Karl Bang ; Prior, Anders ; Christensen, Kaj Sparle. / A comparison of the original major depression inventory with a modified version : A Danish validation study. I: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2024 ; Bind 149, Nr. 3. s. 267-278.

Bibtex

@article{3b93cc5b98724d0faf2f3d59117344fe,
title = "A comparison of the original major depression inventory with a modified version: A Danish validation study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) is a patient-reported outcome measure used by general practitioners to assist with diagnosing and evaluation of the severity of a patient's depression. However, recent studies have questioned the structural validity of the MDI.OBJECTIVES: We proposed a modified version (mMDI) of the MDI with fewer response categories and four rephrased items and aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the changes in a joint cohort of patients from general practice and mental health associations.METHODS: We used Rasch analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to assess the validity and reliability of the two versions. Equipercentile linking was used to compute cut-off points for the mMDI.RESULTS: For both versions, local dependence was found between the three item pairs (loss of interest, lack of energy), (lack of self-confidence, feelings of guilt), and (concentration problems, feeling restless/slowed down). The mMDI displayed lower measurement error in the upper end of the scale and better item level fit for three of the four reformulated items compared to the MDI. For the MDI, 5.3% of the respondents gave improbable responses; the corresponding number was 3.4% for the mMDI. The mMDI displayed better fit to a one-factor model compared to the MDI. When comparing the correlation of the scales with the WHO-5 instrument, the corresponding AUROC estimates for the mMDI and MDI were found to be 0.93 (0.92; 0.96) and 0.91 (0.87; 0.94), respectively. The cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe depression in the mMDI were found to be 17, 20, and 23, respectively.CONCLUSION: The proposed changes of the MDI are psychometrically sound upgrades of the original.",
author = "Pedersen, {Henrik Schou} and Christensen, {Karl Bang} and Anders Prior and Christensen, {Kaj Sparle}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1111/acps.13656",
language = "English",
volume = "149",
pages = "267--278",
journal = "Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-690X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the original major depression inventory with a modified version

T2 - A Danish validation study

AU - Pedersen, Henrik Schou

AU - Christensen, Karl Bang

AU - Prior, Anders

AU - Christensen, Kaj Sparle

N1 - © 2024 The Authors. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - BACKGROUND: The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) is a patient-reported outcome measure used by general practitioners to assist with diagnosing and evaluation of the severity of a patient's depression. However, recent studies have questioned the structural validity of the MDI.OBJECTIVES: We proposed a modified version (mMDI) of the MDI with fewer response categories and four rephrased items and aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the changes in a joint cohort of patients from general practice and mental health associations.METHODS: We used Rasch analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to assess the validity and reliability of the two versions. Equipercentile linking was used to compute cut-off points for the mMDI.RESULTS: For both versions, local dependence was found between the three item pairs (loss of interest, lack of energy), (lack of self-confidence, feelings of guilt), and (concentration problems, feeling restless/slowed down). The mMDI displayed lower measurement error in the upper end of the scale and better item level fit for three of the four reformulated items compared to the MDI. For the MDI, 5.3% of the respondents gave improbable responses; the corresponding number was 3.4% for the mMDI. The mMDI displayed better fit to a one-factor model compared to the MDI. When comparing the correlation of the scales with the WHO-5 instrument, the corresponding AUROC estimates for the mMDI and MDI were found to be 0.93 (0.92; 0.96) and 0.91 (0.87; 0.94), respectively. The cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe depression in the mMDI were found to be 17, 20, and 23, respectively.CONCLUSION: The proposed changes of the MDI are psychometrically sound upgrades of the original.

AB - BACKGROUND: The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) is a patient-reported outcome measure used by general practitioners to assist with diagnosing and evaluation of the severity of a patient's depression. However, recent studies have questioned the structural validity of the MDI.OBJECTIVES: We proposed a modified version (mMDI) of the MDI with fewer response categories and four rephrased items and aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the changes in a joint cohort of patients from general practice and mental health associations.METHODS: We used Rasch analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to assess the validity and reliability of the two versions. Equipercentile linking was used to compute cut-off points for the mMDI.RESULTS: For both versions, local dependence was found between the three item pairs (loss of interest, lack of energy), (lack of self-confidence, feelings of guilt), and (concentration problems, feeling restless/slowed down). The mMDI displayed lower measurement error in the upper end of the scale and better item level fit for three of the four reformulated items compared to the MDI. For the MDI, 5.3% of the respondents gave improbable responses; the corresponding number was 3.4% for the mMDI. The mMDI displayed better fit to a one-factor model compared to the MDI. When comparing the correlation of the scales with the WHO-5 instrument, the corresponding AUROC estimates for the mMDI and MDI were found to be 0.93 (0.92; 0.96) and 0.91 (0.87; 0.94), respectively. The cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe depression in the mMDI were found to be 17, 20, and 23, respectively.CONCLUSION: The proposed changes of the MDI are psychometrically sound upgrades of the original.

U2 - 10.1111/acps.13656

DO - 10.1111/acps.13656

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38229234

VL - 149

SP - 267

EP - 278

JO - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-690X

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 381555541