From science to policy: How European HBM indicators help to answer policy questions related to phthalates and DINCH exposure
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Dokumenter
- Fulltext
Forlagets udgivne version, 7,48 MB, PDF-dokument
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Artikelnummer | 114073 |
Tidsskrift | International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health |
Vol/bind | 247 |
Antal sider | 18 |
ISSN | 1438-4639 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2023 |
Bibliografisk note
Funding Information:
The authors received funding from the EU Horizon 2020 framework (grant agreement No 733032 ). Additional financial support for the conduct of the studies is provided by each participating country.
Funding Information:
The FLEHS IV study was conducted within the framework of the Flemish Center of Expertise on Environment and Health (FLEHS 2016–2020) and funded by the Flemish Government, Department of Environment & Spatial Development .
Funding Information:
The „European Human Biomonitoring (HBM4EU) Initiative“ is a joint effort of 30 European countries, and the European Environment Agency (EEA), co-funded by the European Commission under the framework of Horizon 2020 aiming to improve and inform chemical safety. Using HBM methods the internal exposure of a chemical of interest is determined by measuring this substance in human samples such as urine, blood or hair. Since the internal exposure results from multiple sources, it represents the aggregated exposure from all routes (dermal, inhalation and oral). HBM has been identified as an important tool to support policy making (Ganzleben et al., 2017) but an improved science to policy transfer is urgently needed. Therefore, the focus of this publication is on how HBM indicators may answer policy-related questions and help identifying urgent needs for chemical regulation or management.The authors received funding from the EUHorizon 2020 framework (grant agreement No 733032). Additional financial support for the conduct of the studies is provided by each participating country.The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) has contributed to funding of the Norwegian Environmental Biobank (NEB). The laboratory measurements have partly been funded by the Research Council of Norway through research projects (275903 and 268465).PCB cohort was supported by Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic, grant no. 2012/47-SZU-11 and by Slovak Research and Development Agency, grant no. APVV-0571-12. PCB cohort follow-up received additional funding from the Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic, program 07B0103.Riksmaten Adolescents was performed by the Swedish Food Agency with financial support from the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency and the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency.The CELSPAC study is supported by the MEYS (LM2018121, CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_043/0009632 and CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000469) and from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement (857560). This publication reflects only the author's view and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.The FLEHS IV study was conducted within the framework of the Flemish Center of Expertise on Environment and Health (FLEHS 2016–2020) and funded by the Flemish Government, Department of Environment & Spatial Development.
Funding Information:
PCB cohort was supported by Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic, grant no. 2012/47-SZU-11 and by Slovak Research and Development Agency , grant no. APVV-0571-12 . PCB cohort follow-up received additional funding from the Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic, program 07B0103 .
Funding Information:
CROME study is co-funded by the European Commission research funds of Horizon 2020 and LIFE financial instrument of the European Community (LIFE12 ENV/GR/001040).
Funding Information:
The OCC studies were supported by Odense University Hospital, the Region of Southern Denmark, the Municipality of Odense, the Mental Health Service of the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense Patient data Exploratory Network (OPEN), Novo Nordisk Foundation [grant nr. NNF15OC00017734 and NNF19OC0058266], the Danish Council for Independent Research [4004-00352B_FSS].
Funding Information:
The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) has contributed to funding of the Norwegian Environmental Biobank ( NEB ). The laboratory measurements have partly been funded by the Research Council of Norway through research projects ( 275903 and 268465 ).
Funding Information:
Riksmaten Adolescents was performed by the Swedish Food Agency with financial support from the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency and the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency .
Funding Information:
POLAES study was co-financed by Ministry of Science and Education of Poland (contract no.3764/H2020/2017/2)
Funding Information:
The CELSPAC study is supported by the MEYS ( LM2018121 , CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_043/0009632 and CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000469 ) and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement ( 857560 ). This publication reflects only the author's view and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Funding Information:
ESTEBAN is funded by Santé Publique France and the French ministries of Health and the Environment.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
ID: 337595105