Searching for information about stem cells online in an age of artificial intelligence: How should the stem cell community respond?
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Searching for information about stem cells online in an age of artificial intelligence: How should the stem cell community respond? / Hoeyer, Klaus; Couturier, Anna; Barawi, Kali; Drew, Cheney; Grundtvig, Anders; Lane, Emma; Munk, Anders Kristian; Whiteley, Louise; Munsie, Megan.
I: Stem Cell Reports, Bind 19, 2024.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Searching for information about stem cells online in an age of artificial intelligence: How should the stem cell community respond?
AU - Hoeyer, Klaus
AU - Couturier, Anna
AU - Barawi, Kali
AU - Drew, Cheney
AU - Grundtvig, Anders
AU - Lane, Emma
AU - Munk, Anders Kristian
AU - Whiteley, Louise
AU - Munsie, Megan
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - These are exciting times for those interested in stem cell research. After decades of hard laboratory labor, next-generation stem cell–based products have entered or are about to enter clinical trials for Parkinson disease and other conditions (Gravitz, 2021; Yamanaka, 2020). For researchers, patients, and the public, the promise of regenerative medicine has never been more tangible. However, with unabated growth in direct-to-consumer marketing of unauthorized stem cell treatments across the globe, it is likely that research participants, patients, interested members of the public, journalists, policymakers, and health professionals struggle to obtain accurate information about scientifically validated stem cell therapies (Master et al., 2021). While many are likely to search for answers online, how can individuals discern what information to believe in such a landscape? What determines the information they find? Although what is found will be partly determined by the search engine used, few will understand the economic and technical logics behind the search engine. Indeed, there have been cases in which patients mistake commercial clinics for legitimate trials and have faced serious risks (Kuriyan et al., 2017).
AB - These are exciting times for those interested in stem cell research. After decades of hard laboratory labor, next-generation stem cell–based products have entered or are about to enter clinical trials for Parkinson disease and other conditions (Gravitz, 2021; Yamanaka, 2020). For researchers, patients, and the public, the promise of regenerative medicine has never been more tangible. However, with unabated growth in direct-to-consumer marketing of unauthorized stem cell treatments across the globe, it is likely that research participants, patients, interested members of the public, journalists, policymakers, and health professionals struggle to obtain accurate information about scientifically validated stem cell therapies (Master et al., 2021). While many are likely to search for answers online, how can individuals discern what information to believe in such a landscape? What determines the information they find? Although what is found will be partly determined by the search engine used, few will understand the economic and technical logics behind the search engine. Indeed, there have been cases in which patients mistake commercial clinics for legitimate trials and have faced serious risks (Kuriyan et al., 2017).
U2 - 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.12.009
DO - 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.12.009
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38278153
VL - 19
JO - Stem Cell Reports
JF - Stem Cell Reports
SN - 2213-6711
ER -
ID: 380624846