Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. / Lee, Christina Ji-Young; Gerds, Thomas Alexander; Carlson, Nicholas; Bonde, Anders Nissen; Gislason, Gunnar Hilmar; Lamberts, Morten; Olesen, Jonas Bjerring; Pallisgaard, Jannik Langtved; Hansen, Morten Lock; Torp-Pedersen, Christian.

I: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Bind 72, Nr. 1, 2018, s. 17-26.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lee, CJ-Y, Gerds, TA, Carlson, N, Bonde, AN, Gislason, GH, Lamberts, M, Olesen, JB, Pallisgaard, JL, Hansen, ML & Torp-Pedersen, C 2018, 'Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, bind 72, nr. 1, s. 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.036

APA

Lee, C. J-Y., Gerds, T. A., Carlson, N., Bonde, A. N., Gislason, G. H., Lamberts, M., Olesen, J. B., Pallisgaard, J. L., Hansen, M. L., & Torp-Pedersen, C. (2018). Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.036

Vancouver

Lee CJ-Y, Gerds TA, Carlson N, Bonde AN, Gislason GH, Lamberts M o.a. Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;72(1):17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.036

Author

Lee, Christina Ji-Young ; Gerds, Thomas Alexander ; Carlson, Nicholas ; Bonde, Anders Nissen ; Gislason, Gunnar Hilmar ; Lamberts, Morten ; Olesen, Jonas Bjerring ; Pallisgaard, Jannik Langtved ; Hansen, Morten Lock ; Torp-Pedersen, Christian. / Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. I: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018 ; Bind 72, Nr. 1. s. 17-26.

Bibtex

@article{f8ac3b0f14eb4d3db981932f9c51b843,
title = "Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation",
abstract = "BackgroundEvidence is conflicting as to the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for prevention of myocardial infarction (MI).ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the risk of MI associated with the use of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and VKA in patients with atrial fibrillation.MethodsPatients with atrial fibrillation were identified using Danish health care registers and stratified by initial oral anticoagulant treatment. Standardized absolute 1-year risks were estimated based on Cox regression for hazard rates of MI hospitalizations and mortality. Reported were absolute risks separately for the oral anticoagulation treatments and standardized to the characteristics of the study population.ResultsOf the 31,739 patients included (median age, 74 years; 47% females), the standardized 1-year risk of MI for VKA was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 1.8), apixaban was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.4), dabigatran was 1.2% (95% CI: 1.0 to 1.5), and rivaroxaban was 1.1% (95% CI: 0.8 to 1.3). No significant risk differences were observed in the standardized 1-year risks of MI among the DOACs: dabigatran versus apixaban (0.04%; 95% CI: −0.3 to 0.4), rivaroxaban versus apixaban (0.1%; 95% CI: −0.4 to 0.3), and rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (−0.1%; 95% CI: −0.5 to 0.2). The risk differences for DOACs versus VKA were all significant: −0.4% (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.1) for apixaban, −0.4% (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.03) for dabigatran, and −0.5% (95% CI: −0.8 to −0.2) for rivaroxaban.ConclusionsNo significant risk differences of MI were found in the direct comparisons of DOACs, and DOACs were all associated with a significant risk reduction of MI compared with VKA.",
keywords = "apixaban, dabigatran, direct oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban, vitamin K antagonist",
author = "Lee, {Christina Ji-Young} and Gerds, {Thomas Alexander} and Nicholas Carlson and Bonde, {Anders Nissen} and Gislason, {Gunnar Hilmar} and Morten Lamberts and Olesen, {Jonas Bjerring} and Pallisgaard, {Jannik Langtved} and Hansen, {Morten Lock} and Christian Torp-Pedersen",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.036",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "17--26",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

AU - Lee, Christina Ji-Young

AU - Gerds, Thomas Alexander

AU - Carlson, Nicholas

AU - Bonde, Anders Nissen

AU - Gislason, Gunnar Hilmar

AU - Lamberts, Morten

AU - Olesen, Jonas Bjerring

AU - Pallisgaard, Jannik Langtved

AU - Hansen, Morten Lock

AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - BackgroundEvidence is conflicting as to the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for prevention of myocardial infarction (MI).ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the risk of MI associated with the use of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and VKA in patients with atrial fibrillation.MethodsPatients with atrial fibrillation were identified using Danish health care registers and stratified by initial oral anticoagulant treatment. Standardized absolute 1-year risks were estimated based on Cox regression for hazard rates of MI hospitalizations and mortality. Reported were absolute risks separately for the oral anticoagulation treatments and standardized to the characteristics of the study population.ResultsOf the 31,739 patients included (median age, 74 years; 47% females), the standardized 1-year risk of MI for VKA was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 1.8), apixaban was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.4), dabigatran was 1.2% (95% CI: 1.0 to 1.5), and rivaroxaban was 1.1% (95% CI: 0.8 to 1.3). No significant risk differences were observed in the standardized 1-year risks of MI among the DOACs: dabigatran versus apixaban (0.04%; 95% CI: −0.3 to 0.4), rivaroxaban versus apixaban (0.1%; 95% CI: −0.4 to 0.3), and rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (−0.1%; 95% CI: −0.5 to 0.2). The risk differences for DOACs versus VKA were all significant: −0.4% (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.1) for apixaban, −0.4% (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.03) for dabigatran, and −0.5% (95% CI: −0.8 to −0.2) for rivaroxaban.ConclusionsNo significant risk differences of MI were found in the direct comparisons of DOACs, and DOACs were all associated with a significant risk reduction of MI compared with VKA.

AB - BackgroundEvidence is conflicting as to the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for prevention of myocardial infarction (MI).ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the risk of MI associated with the use of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and VKA in patients with atrial fibrillation.MethodsPatients with atrial fibrillation were identified using Danish health care registers and stratified by initial oral anticoagulant treatment. Standardized absolute 1-year risks were estimated based on Cox regression for hazard rates of MI hospitalizations and mortality. Reported were absolute risks separately for the oral anticoagulation treatments and standardized to the characteristics of the study population.ResultsOf the 31,739 patients included (median age, 74 years; 47% females), the standardized 1-year risk of MI for VKA was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 1.8), apixaban was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.4), dabigatran was 1.2% (95% CI: 1.0 to 1.5), and rivaroxaban was 1.1% (95% CI: 0.8 to 1.3). No significant risk differences were observed in the standardized 1-year risks of MI among the DOACs: dabigatran versus apixaban (0.04%; 95% CI: −0.3 to 0.4), rivaroxaban versus apixaban (0.1%; 95% CI: −0.4 to 0.3), and rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (−0.1%; 95% CI: −0.5 to 0.2). The risk differences for DOACs versus VKA were all significant: −0.4% (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.1) for apixaban, −0.4% (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.03) for dabigatran, and −0.5% (95% CI: −0.8 to −0.2) for rivaroxaban.ConclusionsNo significant risk differences of MI were found in the direct comparisons of DOACs, and DOACs were all associated with a significant risk reduction of MI compared with VKA.

KW - apixaban

KW - dabigatran

KW - direct oral anticoagulant

KW - rivaroxaban

KW - vitamin K antagonist

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.036

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.036

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29957227

VL - 72

SP - 17

EP - 26

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 210012021