Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. / Lee, Christina Ji-Young; Gerds, Thomas Alexander; Carlson, Nicholas; Bonde, Anders Nissen; Gislason, Gunnar Hilmar; Lamberts, Morten; Olesen, Jonas Bjerring; Pallisgaard, Jannik Langtved; Hansen, Morten Lock; Torp-Pedersen, Christian.
I: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Bind 72, Nr. 1, 2018, s. 17-26.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
AU - Lee, Christina Ji-Young
AU - Gerds, Thomas Alexander
AU - Carlson, Nicholas
AU - Bonde, Anders Nissen
AU - Gislason, Gunnar Hilmar
AU - Lamberts, Morten
AU - Olesen, Jonas Bjerring
AU - Pallisgaard, Jannik Langtved
AU - Hansen, Morten Lock
AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - BackgroundEvidence is conflicting as to the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for prevention of myocardial infarction (MI).ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the risk of MI associated with the use of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and VKA in patients with atrial fibrillation.MethodsPatients with atrial fibrillation were identified using Danish health care registers and stratified by initial oral anticoagulant treatment. Standardized absolute 1-year risks were estimated based on Cox regression for hazard rates of MI hospitalizations and mortality. Reported were absolute risks separately for the oral anticoagulation treatments and standardized to the characteristics of the study population.ResultsOf the 31,739 patients included (median age, 74 years; 47% females), the standardized 1-year risk of MI for VKA was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 1.8), apixaban was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.4), dabigatran was 1.2% (95% CI: 1.0 to 1.5), and rivaroxaban was 1.1% (95% CI: 0.8 to 1.3). No significant risk differences were observed in the standardized 1-year risks of MI among the DOACs: dabigatran versus apixaban (0.04%; 95% CI: −0.3 to 0.4), rivaroxaban versus apixaban (0.1%; 95% CI: −0.4 to 0.3), and rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (−0.1%; 95% CI: −0.5 to 0.2). The risk differences for DOACs versus VKA were all significant: −0.4% (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.1) for apixaban, −0.4% (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.03) for dabigatran, and −0.5% (95% CI: −0.8 to −0.2) for rivaroxaban.ConclusionsNo significant risk differences of MI were found in the direct comparisons of DOACs, and DOACs were all associated with a significant risk reduction of MI compared with VKA.
AB - BackgroundEvidence is conflicting as to the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for prevention of myocardial infarction (MI).ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the risk of MI associated with the use of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and VKA in patients with atrial fibrillation.MethodsPatients with atrial fibrillation were identified using Danish health care registers and stratified by initial oral anticoagulant treatment. Standardized absolute 1-year risks were estimated based on Cox regression for hazard rates of MI hospitalizations and mortality. Reported were absolute risks separately for the oral anticoagulation treatments and standardized to the characteristics of the study population.ResultsOf the 31,739 patients included (median age, 74 years; 47% females), the standardized 1-year risk of MI for VKA was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 1.8), apixaban was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.4), dabigatran was 1.2% (95% CI: 1.0 to 1.5), and rivaroxaban was 1.1% (95% CI: 0.8 to 1.3). No significant risk differences were observed in the standardized 1-year risks of MI among the DOACs: dabigatran versus apixaban (0.04%; 95% CI: −0.3 to 0.4), rivaroxaban versus apixaban (0.1%; 95% CI: −0.4 to 0.3), and rivaroxaban versus dabigatran (−0.1%; 95% CI: −0.5 to 0.2). The risk differences for DOACs versus VKA were all significant: −0.4% (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.1) for apixaban, −0.4% (95% CI: −0.7 to −0.03) for dabigatran, and −0.5% (95% CI: −0.8 to −0.2) for rivaroxaban.ConclusionsNo significant risk differences of MI were found in the direct comparisons of DOACs, and DOACs were all associated with a significant risk reduction of MI compared with VKA.
KW - apixaban
KW - dabigatran
KW - direct oral anticoagulant
KW - rivaroxaban
KW - vitamin K antagonist
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.036
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.036
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 29957227
VL - 72
SP - 17
EP - 26
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
SN - 0735-1097
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 210012021