[Implementation barriers--commentaries from organisational sociology] Implementeringsbarrierer - en organisationssociologisk nuancering

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

[Implementation barriers--commentaries from organisational sociology] Implementeringsbarrierer - en organisationssociologisk nuancering. / Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm; Thorsen, T.

I: Ugeskrift for læger, Bind 171, Nr. 20, 2009, s. 1688-1691.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kousgaard, MB & Thorsen, T 2009, '[Implementation barriers--commentaries from organisational sociology] Implementeringsbarrierer - en organisationssociologisk nuancering', Ugeskrift for læger, bind 171, nr. 20, s. 1688-1691.

APA

Kousgaard, M. B., & Thorsen, T. (2009). [Implementation barriers--commentaries from organisational sociology] Implementeringsbarrierer - en organisationssociologisk nuancering. Ugeskrift for læger, 171(20), 1688-1691.

Vancouver

Kousgaard MB, Thorsen T. [Implementation barriers--commentaries from organisational sociology] Implementeringsbarrierer - en organisationssociologisk nuancering. Ugeskrift for læger. 2009;171(20):1688-1691.

Author

Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm ; Thorsen, T. / [Implementation barriers--commentaries from organisational sociology] Implementeringsbarrierer - en organisationssociologisk nuancering. I: Ugeskrift for læger. 2009 ; Bind 171, Nr. 20. s. 1688-1691.

Bibtex

@article{021ce220c24a11df825b000ea68e967b,
title = "[Implementation barriers--commentaries from organisational sociology] Implementeringsbarrierer - en organisationssociologisk nuancering",
abstract = "During the last two decades numerous technologies for improving the quality of care have been introduced in the healthcare sector. The various problems encountered by such endeavours have given rise to a large number of studies attempting to identify the most effective techniques for implementation and the most important barriers to change. However, the barrier-centred approach to change has not yet fulfilled the expectations of its promoters and has recently come under criticism from research in organisational change. The article explores the contents and implications of this critique Udgivelsesdato: 2009/5/11",
author = "Kousgaard, {Marius Brostr{\o}m} and T. Thorsen",
note = "DA - 20090520IS - 1603-6824 (Electronic)IS - 0041-5782 (Linking)LA - danPT - English AbstractPT - Journal ArticleSB - IM",
year = "2009",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "171",
pages = "1688--1691",
journal = "Ugeskrift for Laeger",
issn = "0041-5782",
publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",
number = "20",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Implementation barriers--commentaries from organisational sociology] Implementeringsbarrierer - en organisationssociologisk nuancering

AU - Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm

AU - Thorsen, T.

N1 - DA - 20090520IS - 1603-6824 (Electronic)IS - 0041-5782 (Linking)LA - danPT - English AbstractPT - Journal ArticleSB - IM

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - During the last two decades numerous technologies for improving the quality of care have been introduced in the healthcare sector. The various problems encountered by such endeavours have given rise to a large number of studies attempting to identify the most effective techniques for implementation and the most important barriers to change. However, the barrier-centred approach to change has not yet fulfilled the expectations of its promoters and has recently come under criticism from research in organisational change. The article explores the contents and implications of this critique Udgivelsesdato: 2009/5/11

AB - During the last two decades numerous technologies for improving the quality of care have been introduced in the healthcare sector. The various problems encountered by such endeavours have given rise to a large number of studies attempting to identify the most effective techniques for implementation and the most important barriers to change. However, the barrier-centred approach to change has not yet fulfilled the expectations of its promoters and has recently come under criticism from research in organisational change. The article explores the contents and implications of this critique Udgivelsesdato: 2009/5/11

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 171

SP - 1688

EP - 1691

JO - Ugeskrift for Laeger

JF - Ugeskrift for Laeger

SN - 0041-5782

IS - 20

ER -

ID: 22043455