Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of self-reported cognitive difficulty in cancer patients

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of self-reported cognitive difficulty in cancer patients. / EORTC Quality of Life Group.

I: Neuro-Oncology Practice, Bind 4, Nr. 3, 2017, s. 189-196.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

EORTC Quality of Life Group 2017, 'Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of self-reported cognitive difficulty in cancer patients', Neuro-Oncology Practice, bind 4, nr. 3, s. 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npw026

APA

EORTC Quality of Life Group (2017). Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of self-reported cognitive difficulty in cancer patients. Neuro-Oncology Practice, 4(3), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npw026

Vancouver

EORTC Quality of Life Group. Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of self-reported cognitive difficulty in cancer patients. Neuro-Oncology Practice. 2017;4(3):189-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npw026

Author

EORTC Quality of Life Group. / Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of self-reported cognitive difficulty in cancer patients. I: Neuro-Oncology Practice. 2017 ; Bind 4, Nr. 3. s. 189-196.

Bibtex

@article{972fc353b36f4b259b62dbde9f171ffe,
title = "Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of self-reported cognitive difficulty in cancer patients",
abstract = "Background: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group is developing computerized adaptive testing (CAT) versions of each scale of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). This study aims to develop an item bank for the EORTC QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning scale, which can be used for CAT.Methods: The complete developmental approach comprised four phases: (I) conceptualization and literature search, (II) operationalization, (III) pretesting, and (IV) field-testing. This paper describes phases I-III.I) A literature search was performed to identify self-report instruments and items measuring cognitive complaints on concentration and memory. II) A multistep item-selection procedure was applied to select and generate items that were relevant and compatible with the 'QLQ-C30 item style.' III) Cancer patients from different countries evaluated the item list for wording (ie, whether items were difficult, confusing, annoying, upsetting or intrusive), and whether relevant issues were missing.Results: A list of 439 items was generated by the literature search. In the multistep item-selection procedure, these items were evaluated for relevance, redundancy, clarity, and response format, resulting in an list of 45 items. A total of 32 patients evaluated this item list in the pretesting phase, resulting in a preliminary list of 44 items.Conclusion: Phase I-III resulted in an item list of 44 items measuring self-reported cognitive complaints that was endorsed by international experts and cancer patients in several countries. This list will be evaluated for its psychometric characteristics in phase IV.",
author = "Linda Dirven and Taphoorn, {Martin J. B.} and Mogens Gr{\o}nvold and Habets, {Esther J. J.} and Aaronson, {Neil K.} and Thierry Conroy and Reijneveld, {Jaap C.} and Teresa Young and Petersen, {Morten Aa.} and {EORTC Quality of Life Group}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1093/nop/npw026",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "189--196",
journal = "Neuro-Oncology Practice",
issn = "2054-2577",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of self-reported cognitive difficulty in cancer patients

AU - Dirven, Linda

AU - Taphoorn, Martin J. B.

AU - Grønvold, Mogens

AU - Habets, Esther J. J.

AU - Aaronson, Neil K.

AU - Conroy, Thierry

AU - Reijneveld, Jaap C.

AU - Young, Teresa

AU - Petersen, Morten Aa.

AU - EORTC Quality of Life Group

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group is developing computerized adaptive testing (CAT) versions of each scale of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). This study aims to develop an item bank for the EORTC QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning scale, which can be used for CAT.Methods: The complete developmental approach comprised four phases: (I) conceptualization and literature search, (II) operationalization, (III) pretesting, and (IV) field-testing. This paper describes phases I-III.I) A literature search was performed to identify self-report instruments and items measuring cognitive complaints on concentration and memory. II) A multistep item-selection procedure was applied to select and generate items that were relevant and compatible with the 'QLQ-C30 item style.' III) Cancer patients from different countries evaluated the item list for wording (ie, whether items were difficult, confusing, annoying, upsetting or intrusive), and whether relevant issues were missing.Results: A list of 439 items was generated by the literature search. In the multistep item-selection procedure, these items were evaluated for relevance, redundancy, clarity, and response format, resulting in an list of 45 items. A total of 32 patients evaluated this item list in the pretesting phase, resulting in a preliminary list of 44 items.Conclusion: Phase I-III resulted in an item list of 44 items measuring self-reported cognitive complaints that was endorsed by international experts and cancer patients in several countries. This list will be evaluated for its psychometric characteristics in phase IV.

AB - Background: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group is developing computerized adaptive testing (CAT) versions of each scale of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). This study aims to develop an item bank for the EORTC QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning scale, which can be used for CAT.Methods: The complete developmental approach comprised four phases: (I) conceptualization and literature search, (II) operationalization, (III) pretesting, and (IV) field-testing. This paper describes phases I-III.I) A literature search was performed to identify self-report instruments and items measuring cognitive complaints on concentration and memory. II) A multistep item-selection procedure was applied to select and generate items that were relevant and compatible with the 'QLQ-C30 item style.' III) Cancer patients from different countries evaluated the item list for wording (ie, whether items were difficult, confusing, annoying, upsetting or intrusive), and whether relevant issues were missing.Results: A list of 439 items was generated by the literature search. In the multistep item-selection procedure, these items were evaluated for relevance, redundancy, clarity, and response format, resulting in an list of 45 items. A total of 32 patients evaluated this item list in the pretesting phase, resulting in a preliminary list of 44 items.Conclusion: Phase I-III resulted in an item list of 44 items measuring self-reported cognitive complaints that was endorsed by international experts and cancer patients in several countries. This list will be evaluated for its psychometric characteristics in phase IV.

U2 - 10.1093/nop/npw026

DO - 10.1093/nop/npw026

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31385966

VL - 4

SP - 189

EP - 196

JO - Neuro-Oncology Practice

JF - Neuro-Oncology Practice

SN - 2054-2577

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 225520861