Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography. / Claudius, C; Skovgaard, L T; Viby-Mogensen, J.

I: British Journal of Anaesthesia, Bind 105, Nr. 3, 2010, s. 310-317.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Claudius, C, Skovgaard, LT & Viby-Mogensen, J 2010, 'Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography', British Journal of Anaesthesia, bind 105, nr. 3, s. 310-317. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq162

APA

Claudius, C., Skovgaard, L. T., & Viby-Mogensen, J. (2010). Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 105(3), 310-317. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq162

Vancouver

Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen J. Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2010;105(3):310-317. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq162

Author

Claudius, C ; Skovgaard, L T ; Viby-Mogensen, J. / Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography. I: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2010 ; Bind 105, Nr. 3. s. 310-317.

Bibtex

@article{4f64e287161b4fa4a4ee3a345f6b3d59,
title = "Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography",
abstract = "Studies comparing acceleromyography and mechanomyography indicate that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. However, it is uncertain to what extent differences in precision between the methods and the naturally occurring arm-to-arm variation have influenced the results of these studies. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to examine the precision and the arm-to-arm variation, when the same method is used on both of the arms.",
keywords = "Acceleration, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Androstanols, Anesthesia Recovery Period, Bias (Epidemiology), Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Myography, Neuromuscular Blockade, Neuromuscular Junction, Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult",
author = "C Claudius and Skovgaard, {L T} and J Viby-Mogensen",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1093/bja/aeq162",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "310--317",
journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0007-0912",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography

AU - Claudius, C

AU - Skovgaard, L T

AU - Viby-Mogensen, J

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Studies comparing acceleromyography and mechanomyography indicate that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. However, it is uncertain to what extent differences in precision between the methods and the naturally occurring arm-to-arm variation have influenced the results of these studies. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to examine the precision and the arm-to-arm variation, when the same method is used on both of the arms.

AB - Studies comparing acceleromyography and mechanomyography indicate that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. However, it is uncertain to what extent differences in precision between the methods and the naturally occurring arm-to-arm variation have influenced the results of these studies. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to examine the precision and the arm-to-arm variation, when the same method is used on both of the arms.

KW - Acceleration

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Androstanols

KW - Anesthesia Recovery Period

KW - Bias (Epidemiology)

KW - Electric Stimulation

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Monitoring, Intraoperative

KW - Myography

KW - Neuromuscular Blockade

KW - Neuromuscular Junction

KW - Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1093/bja/aeq162

DO - 10.1093/bja/aeq162

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 20595196

VL - 105

SP - 310

EP - 317

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0007-0912

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 33142979